BC Election 2009

The race for Victoria

 
 

    Home  
  • About
  • Candidates
  • Platforms
  • Polls
  • Referendum
  • Results
  • Ridings
  • Target Seats
  •   

  • Electoral Districts

  • Recent Comments

    • gragor on Comox Valley
    • Mike Summers on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • yuppers on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • Taylor Verrall on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Taylor Verrall on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • True Conservative on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • Glass on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Dietz on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Splendor Sine Occasu on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • brg on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • shepsil on Absentee ballot performance
    • Nick J Boragina on Vicki Huntington – Elected – Analysis
  • Parties

    • BC Liberal Party (85)
    • BC NDP (85)
    • BC Greens (85)
    • BC Conservatives (24)
    • BC Refederation Party (22)
    • BC Libertarian (6)
    • People’s Front (4)
    • Reform Party of BC (4)
    • The Sex Party (3)
    • Communist Party of BC (3)
    • Work Less Party of BC (2)
    • Your Political Party of BC (2)
    • Nation Alliance Party (2)
    • BC Marijuana (1)
    • Western Canada Concept (1)
  • Independents

    • How to be added to this list
    • Tim Felger (Abbotsford South)
    • Vicki Huntington (Delta South)
    • John Shavluk (Delta South)
    • Alan Clarke (Kelowna-Lake Country)
    • Arthur Hadland (Peace River North)
    • Graham Clark (Vancouver-Fairview)
    • Menard Caissy (Vancouver-West End)
    • Saul Andersen (Victoria-Beacon Hill)
    • David Marley (West Vancouver-Capilano)
  • Resources

    • Elections BC – 2005 Results
    • Elections BC – Boundaries
    • Elections BC – Financing
    • Electoral Boundaries Commission
    • Milton Chan’s Election Prediction
    • Wikipedia 2005 – Election Results
    • Wikipedia 2005 – Referendum
    • Wikipedia 2009 – Election Results
    • Wikipedia 2009 – Referendum
  • Referendum

    • BC Government – Referendum
    • Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform
    • Pro-STV: Fair Voting BC
    • Pro-FPTP: NO STV
  • Archives

    • September 2009 (1)
    • July 2009 (1)
    • June 2009 (6)
    • May 2009 (61)
    • April 2009 (93)
    • March 2009 (47)
    • February 2009 (41)
    • January 2009 (29)
    • December 2008 (11)
    • November 2008 (16)
    • October 2008 (17)
    • September 2008 (18)
    • August 2008 (22)
    • July 2008 (14)
    • June 2008 (15)
    • May 2008 (10)
    • April 2008 (5)
    • March 2008 (7)
    • February 2008 (7)
    • January 2008 (3)
  • Categories

    • Analysis (96)
    • By-Election (31)
    • Irrelevant and Irreverent (18)
    • Issues (53)
      • Economy (17)
      • Environment (7)
      • First Nations (1)
      • Healthcare (1)
      • Justice (5)
      • Olympics (5)
      • Scandal (12)
      • Transportation (8)
    • Legislature (33)
    • Links (8)
    • News (85)
    • Parties (93)
      • BC Greens (15)
      • BC Liberals (36)
      • NDP (31)
      • Other Parties (12)
    • Polls (43)
    • Predictions (6)
    • Referendum (15)
  • Admin

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org

Patrick Kinsella / Does the public care?

Posted April 17, 2009 by Sacha Peter - Link
Category: Analysis, Scandal Comments (6)

The NDP have been trying to bring up Patrick Kinsella and his relationship between the government, the BC Liberal Party, BC Rail, and about $300,000 in contract payments.

They are likely trying to create a sentiment of public outrage equivalent to that of David Dingwall’s classic quote “I’m entitled to my entitlements”, but I’m having my doubts that any of this will stick without more of a “story”, such as the entire sponsorship scandal. Certainly having police raid the legislature is quite an event, but will the events of many years ago have any effect on the voting public? Will any marginal BC Liberal voters stay home as a result of this press campaign?

  1. tebo commented -
    (April 17, 2009 @ 06:31):

    The NDP live in the past and cant find any current issues to raise; so they dredge up stuff from the past…..they love to spend money and love “fudge it budgets” and will never get my vote.

  2. David Hawkins commented -
    (April 17, 2009 @ 07:26):

    It’s not just a Liberal/Patrick Kinsella issue.

    Wittingly or unwittingly, NDP leaders and David Emerson set up the Premier’s Office with secure networks (TruePass) for insider/outsider trading (e.g. CN Rail), short selling (e.g. Nortel, AIG) and money laundering (e.g. Olympic debt-for-equity swaps) through bcIMC, the provincial pension fund.

    Note that the RCMP monitored both then premier Glen Clark and Premier Gordon Campbell in connection with breach of trust.

    We believe RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli was replaced with a bureaucrat – William Elliot – to shut down investigations into frauds on the pension funds by ‘TruePass’ insiders of both the main parties.

    The government and the public pension fund may be on the brink of insolvency; unable to pay its[Olympic] debts as they fall due.

    Reform is needed
    http://www.reformbc.net/recover.htm

    David Hawkins, BC Reform Candidate
    Surrey – White Rock

  3. Kay commented -
    (April 17, 2009 @ 09:21):

    I’d rather have the NDP “spending money” on social issues than have the Liberals giving my money away to their friends. Life was good in the “70’s, but that was “living in past”….and so was the fudge-it-budget. But then there is deja vu, all over again with the STV, when the Conservatives and Liberals joined together in the ’50’s to form the Social Credit, and did their own form of ballot counting. At least this time they can’t put posters up claiming that allowing the vote to Indo-Canadians and Asians would be a “vote for the socialist hordes” Do a little historical research. It’s beyond me how any non-caucasian could vote anything other than NDP. Or, anyone with any values could vote Liberal. But, I guess we’ll never know. The facts are, undoubtedly, “before the courts”

  4. Rav commented -
    (April 17, 2009 @ 12:00):

    Teebo: just wait and see the budget update in the summer. I can bet you that the Liberal budget is off target and the deficit will be much higher than 495 million. I can bet it will be in the couple BILLION DOLLAR range… all signs sure say that… Highest unemployment rate, # of bankruptcies etc…

  5. hastings&victoria commented -
    (April 17, 2009 @ 12:30):

    i think it’s the liberals that live in the past, all they talk about is the fast ferries, is that the best they can do, i guess so

  6. David Hawkins commented -
    (April 17, 2009 @ 15:22):

    All bets are off and election promises are void if bcIMC proves to be insolvent.

    Neither the NDP or the Liberals have the knowledge needed to balance the pension fund expectations of retired public servants (Teachers, College, Public Admin and Municipal) and the collapse in taxable income of private sector.

    Reform does.
    http://www.reformbc.net/recover.htm

    David Hawkins, BC Reform Candidate
    Surrey – White Rock

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

More articles
Previous: Globe and Mail on the BC Election
Next: Canucks and voter turnout

About BC2009.COM - Comments Policy