BC Election 2009

The race for Victoria

 
 

    Home  
  • About
  • Candidates
  • Platforms
  • Polls
  • Referendum
  • Results
  • Ridings
  • Target Seats
  •   

  • Electoral Districts

  • Recent Comments

    • gragor on Comox Valley
    • Mike Summers on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • yuppers on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • Taylor Verrall on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Taylor Verrall on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • True Conservative on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • Glass on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Dietz on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Splendor Sine Occasu on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • brg on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • shepsil on Absentee ballot performance
    • Nick J Boragina on Vicki Huntington – Elected – Analysis
  • Parties

    • BC Liberal Party (85)
    • BC NDP (85)
    • BC Greens (85)
    • BC Conservatives (24)
    • BC Refederation Party (22)
    • BC Libertarian (6)
    • People’s Front (4)
    • Reform Party of BC (4)
    • The Sex Party (3)
    • Communist Party of BC (3)
    • Work Less Party of BC (2)
    • Your Political Party of BC (2)
    • Nation Alliance Party (2)
    • BC Marijuana (1)
    • Western Canada Concept (1)
  • Independents

    • How to be added to this list
    • Tim Felger (Abbotsford South)
    • Vicki Huntington (Delta South)
    • John Shavluk (Delta South)
    • Alan Clarke (Kelowna-Lake Country)
    • Arthur Hadland (Peace River North)
    • Graham Clark (Vancouver-Fairview)
    • Menard Caissy (Vancouver-West End)
    • Saul Andersen (Victoria-Beacon Hill)
    • David Marley (West Vancouver-Capilano)
  • Resources

    • Elections BC – 2005 Results
    • Elections BC – Boundaries
    • Elections BC – Financing
    • Electoral Boundaries Commission
    • Milton Chan’s Election Prediction
    • Wikipedia 2005 – Election Results
    • Wikipedia 2005 – Referendum
    • Wikipedia 2009 – Election Results
    • Wikipedia 2009 – Referendum
  • Referendum

    • BC Government – Referendum
    • Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform
    • Pro-STV: Fair Voting BC
    • Pro-FPTP: NO STV
  • Archives

    • September 2009 (1)
    • July 2009 (1)
    • June 2009 (6)
    • May 2009 (61)
    • April 2009 (93)
    • March 2009 (47)
    • February 2009 (41)
    • January 2009 (29)
    • December 2008 (11)
    • November 2008 (16)
    • October 2008 (17)
    • September 2008 (18)
    • August 2008 (22)
    • July 2008 (14)
    • June 2008 (15)
    • May 2008 (10)
    • April 2008 (5)
    • March 2008 (7)
    • February 2008 (7)
    • January 2008 (3)
  • Categories

    • Analysis (96)
    • By-Election (31)
    • Irrelevant and Irreverent (18)
    • Issues (53)
      • Economy (17)
      • Environment (7)
      • First Nations (1)
      • Healthcare (1)
      • Justice (5)
      • Olympics (5)
      • Scandal (12)
      • Transportation (8)
    • Legislature (33)
    • Links (8)
    • News (85)
    • Parties (93)
      • BC Greens (15)
      • BC Liberals (36)
      • NDP (31)
      • Other Parties (12)
    • Polls (43)
    • Predictions (6)
    • Referendum (15)
  • Admin

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org

All-candidates meetings

Posted April 14, 2009 by Sacha Peter - Link
Category: NDP Comments (2)

Anybody that has worked on a campaign know that all-candidates meetings at the federal and provincial level has little to do with genuine debate – it generally is about stuffing the audience with as many supporters as possible and being able to cheer on your preferred candidate. If the moderators make the mistake of allowing the public to ask questions, the questions that will be asked will be as supportive to the candidates’ platform. Finally, everything will be digitally recorded and any comments made that could be considered incriminating will be put instantly up on Youtube and will be attempted to be made into a huge issue.

Candidates have much more to lose than to gain by going to these events. Incumbent candidates especially have more to lose.

The public is generally aware of this; as a result, candidates lose very little by not showing up, especially if their presence is “visible” elsewhere in the election campaign and they are not seen as “hiding”.

I observe with great amusement (courtesy of the Public Eye Online) that the BC Liberal candidate in Victoria-Beacon Hill, Dallas Henault, challenging Carole James to show up for an all-candidates’ debate in the riding. James, quite correctly, is probably not going to show up.

On Geoff Sharpe’s weblog on this issue (who is siding with the BC Liberals), he posts about this issue, but the BC Liberals themselves have smartly keep their mouths shut about this issue because as I commented, I doubt Premier Gordon Campbell would want to be going to all-candidates’ meetings in his riding. I would love to see him debate with the leader of the Sex Party, who is running in Vancouver-Point Grey.

  1. Geoff S commented -
    (April 14, 2009 @ 19:40):

    Very true Sacha, they do have much more to loose. I honestly wish both leaders would debate. It certainly would add a bit of excitment to an otherwise boring race (in their constituencies). I say this knowing that the Premier’s riding is much closer then the Victoria Beacon Hill.

    By the way you’ve got a great site going on. I would be hard pressed to find another one with as much analysis.

  2. Sacha Peter commented -
    (April 14, 2009 @ 22:58):

    The best idea I heard was on CKNW – Christy Clark vs. Carole James in a cage match.

    Thank you for your comments. I do get things incorrect sometimes as well, but that’s one of the consequences of tossing out a lot of content.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

More articles
Previous: Looking at the “scrap the gas tax” backlash
Next: BC Liberal election platform

About BC2009.COM - Comments Policy