BC Election 2009

The race for Victoria

 
 

    Home  
  • About
  • Candidates
  • Platforms
  • Polls
  • Referendum
  • Results
  • Ridings
  • Target Seats
  •   

  • Electoral Districts

  • Recent Comments

    • gragor on Comox Valley
    • Mike Summers on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • yuppers on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • Taylor Verrall on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Taylor Verrall on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • True Conservative on BC Conservative infighting continues
    • Glass on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Dietz on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • Splendor Sine Occasu on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • brg on Bill Tieleman on NDP strategic error on carbon tax
    • shepsil on Absentee ballot performance
    • Nick J Boragina on Vicki Huntington – Elected – Analysis
  • Parties

    • BC Liberal Party (85)
    • BC NDP (85)
    • BC Greens (85)
    • BC Conservatives (24)
    • BC Refederation Party (22)
    • BC Libertarian (6)
    • People’s Front (4)
    • Reform Party of BC (4)
    • The Sex Party (3)
    • Communist Party of BC (3)
    • Work Less Party of BC (2)
    • Your Political Party of BC (2)
    • Nation Alliance Party (2)
    • BC Marijuana (1)
    • Western Canada Concept (1)
  • Independents

    • How to be added to this list
    • Tim Felger (Abbotsford South)
    • Vicki Huntington (Delta South)
    • John Shavluk (Delta South)
    • Alan Clarke (Kelowna-Lake Country)
    • Arthur Hadland (Peace River North)
    • Graham Clark (Vancouver-Fairview)
    • Menard Caissy (Vancouver-West End)
    • Saul Andersen (Victoria-Beacon Hill)
    • David Marley (West Vancouver-Capilano)
  • Resources

    • Elections BC – 2005 Results
    • Elections BC – Boundaries
    • Elections BC – Financing
    • Electoral Boundaries Commission
    • Milton Chan’s Election Prediction
    • Wikipedia 2005 – Election Results
    • Wikipedia 2005 – Referendum
    • Wikipedia 2009 – Election Results
    • Wikipedia 2009 – Referendum
  • Referendum

    • BC Government – Referendum
    • Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform
    • Pro-STV: Fair Voting BC
    • Pro-FPTP: NO STV
  • Archives

    • September 2009 (1)
    • July 2009 (1)
    • June 2009 (6)
    • May 2009 (61)
    • April 2009 (93)
    • March 2009 (47)
    • February 2009 (41)
    • January 2009 (29)
    • December 2008 (11)
    • November 2008 (16)
    • October 2008 (17)
    • September 2008 (18)
    • August 2008 (22)
    • July 2008 (14)
    • June 2008 (15)
    • May 2008 (10)
    • April 2008 (5)
    • March 2008 (7)
    • February 2008 (7)
    • January 2008 (3)
  • Categories

    • Analysis (96)
    • By-Election (31)
    • Irrelevant and Irreverent (18)
    • Issues (53)
      • Economy (17)
      • Environment (7)
      • First Nations (1)
      • Healthcare (1)
      • Justice (5)
      • Olympics (5)
      • Scandal (12)
      • Transportation (8)
    • Legislature (33)
    • Links (8)
    • News (85)
    • Parties (93)
      • BC Greens (15)
      • BC Liberals (36)
      • NDP (31)
      • Other Parties (12)
    • Polls (43)
    • Predictions (6)
    • Referendum (15)
  • Admin

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org

STV Referendum – who gets the money?

Posted January 12, 2009 by Sacha Peter - Link
Category: Referendum Comments Off

Bill Tieleman’s group, KnowSTV, recently announced that they are the official “no” proponent to the STV referendum. They will receive up to $500,000 in provincial funding. To achieve this aim, they have legally formed a society called the “NO BC-STV Campaign Society”.

Tieleman is very well known to political followers in British Columbia, mainly being the driving force behind the Basi-Virk legislature raid issue, and also being a thorn to the BC Liberal government.

Very politically cunning, Tieleman will give the “yes” proponents a good run for their money.

The proponent side will likely be the BC arm of Fair Vote Canada, running stv.ca. I have not heard any announcements from them whether they have been selected yet.

The “no” side has likely won simply due to the question on the ballot being significantly different than the 2005 question. I will still following the referendum just as closely as the general election, as the referendum will be a general proxy on how alienated the public feels from the electoral system – my theory would be that the more alienation that exists, the more willing the public will choose STV.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

More articles
Previous: Party websites
Next: STV Referendum – Proponents

About BC2009.COM - Comments Policy